« The Brutal Truth | Main | Building on the Ruins of Civilization »

February 16, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

cavalaxis

Thank you for this.

&rew

Lots of food for thought. Thank you!

quirkyartist

Copyright is always an interesting issue. I tend to agree with pretty much everything you said. One thing I wonder about, in the 'fine art' world, where does 'appropriation' end and breach of copyright begin? I did some digital images about Guantanamo Bay, appropriating images from art history and altering them. Most of the images I used are out of copyright (Rembrandt, Giorgione, Michelangelo) but one or two were not. It was a student thing and I just used what would work. However I wouldn't exhibit or sell the ones that aren't out of copyright.

Lee Kottner

Yeah, fine art is way trickier, I think. I can't say I know of any cases where an artist was sued for using an image in their work. Usually, it's so transformed that it doesn't much resemble the original, and that usually covers the problem. But even with old masters' work, you have to be careful. The museums that own the work generaly want a fee for its use. I think I paid about $100 to the Louvre to use an image of their Three Graces relief, but didn't have to pay to use part of DaVinci's The Creation. But that was also for an edition I was selling, which does seem to make a difference, at least in whether they'll come after you or not.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

My Artist's Books

  • Border and Frontier

    Add to Your Collection

  • Stories From the Ruins

    Add to Your Collection

  • Highfield's Recipes From a Good Life

    Not For Sale

Photos

  • www.flickr.com

Quit wasting your time here . . .

  • Go to your studio!
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Crosstown Traffic

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2003

Fellow Travelers

Web Comics